Sunday, February 04, 2007

Intimations of Immortality and the Problem of the Super Bowl


In general, I am opposed to nostalgia. As an impulse, it usually strikes me as weak-minded, to be avoided at all costs. When we are young, the world appears to us to have great hidden meaning and an almost magical power to enchant. As we get older, we begin to see into the workings of things and discover how much of what we once took for magic and meaning is in fact a confidence trick animated by commerce. It’s a melancholy but natural evolution, fertile ground for the poets, from Virgil to Wordsworth to Proust and Joyce. To ignore the ancestry of this process, to say “no, the world of my youth WAS magical, and now the world has gone to shit,” is to willfully close one’s eyes to the human condition.

With that as a preface, I confront The Problem of the Super Bowl.

For me, the Super Bowl represents everything that is diseased in America, everything that threatens to consume us and reduce our spirits. It’s the pinnacle of the advertising age – the summation of all of our efforts to make a science of selling things to each other. How thorough and inescapable that science has become, the ways in which it seems to have colonized literature and art and music and sports and every single thing that we say or do or need in our lives… this is the source of an immense anxiety in our culture today, and yes, the source of a gnawing nostalgia, one that No Mas trades in as much as anyone else.

This nostalgia yearns backwards to a time when that science was in its infancy, when its algorithms were flawed, when it was stumbling forward blindly to the ultimate realization of its power. When you look back at sports in the media in the 60’s and 70’s, you see just the dawning of an awareness, equations being frantically drawn on a blackboard and just as quickly erased before your eyes. No one knew quite yet what they were holding in their hands, and that ignorance frequently led to wildness, chaos, absurdity, all of which in retrospect is enormously pleasing.

William Carlos Williams famously wrote, “It is the anarchy of poverty that delights me,” a line that has proven controversial, in that Williams, who himself was not poor, is seen to have been literarily slumming it, idealizing poverty from a safe distance. It’s hard to argue with some essential truth of that criticism, but as I read it the point of this line is a question of aesthetics only - because poor people cannot afford to control every aspect of their environment, Williams says, that environment takes on a shape of its own, a shape that ironically almost always proves to be richer and more nourishing than those manicured spaces of wealth and design.

Which brings me to the Super Bowl, the most manicured space of them all, nine or eleven or however many hours of television pomp and circumstance in which not a single second is unaccounted for, not a single moment unplanned, nothing left to chance except for the game itself, and yet somehow that minor offering to the gods feels miniscule in the midst of the unforgiving physics that govern the proceedings at large.

What blandness that physics yields, what stultifying absence. I can’t decide how much of my disgust is a product of the small-mindedness of nostalgia, and how much is a genuine awareness of something that has been lost and is seemingly unrecoverable. But I do know that if any one thing can be said to guide our obsessions here at No Mas, it’s the search for and celebration of those sports and athletes and characters, past and present, that manage to exist outside the military industrial complex of the Super Bowl and all of its bastard children. We celebrate them as we celebrate the glaciers or the rainforests or the beauty of an endangered species – sadly, because soon we fear they all will be gone.

7 Comments:

Drew said...

sublime- my favorite article on this blog yet. if nostalgia is a great drug, then advertisers are just slipping it into our veins. kudos, large.

9:26 AM  
C.I. said...

Amen my brother.

Last night straight up bummed me out. Unless you had bet the over on turnovers, that was a stunningly disappointing game...

I don't know if it was the wet or some kind of empathy for what Rex Grossman will have to face as a goat in Chicago after that implosion, but even the Colts themselves had trouble getting very excited about their win. I guess if you truly believe God did it, there's not a lot of reason to celebrate your own accomplishment. In any case, God seemed to really have it out for ol' Rex Grossman. Only his sports psychologist and his momma are gonna call him "Sexy Rexy" now.

You'd think with all that time to develop the sports-industrial complex, they might have actually spent some of their R&D; money making the game interesting. I guess that's the one remaining way that the Super Bowl can undermine itself as a marketing event and reveal itself as an actual sporting contest. The game can suck. You know things have gone completely through the looking glass when you are rooting for a change of possession so you can watch commercials.

On that subject, can I get some help with a count of how many ads involved tallking animals this year, and is it possible not be amused by them?

I got:

Gorillas - Bud Light (pretty funny)
Lions - Taco Bell (tried to pretend it was not funny but still laughed)
Turtles - Car Insurance (was amazed that they did nothing but have turtles say a direct pitch for car insurance, but was still fascinated that they could talk)

10:10 AM  
Large said...

Blockbuster - guinea pig, rabbit, mouse. Very Disney.

Ruskin's pathetic fallacy on the grandest stage.

10:48 AM  
Kevin said...

well written blog.

8:31 PM  
madsear said...

first of all congratulations on the article.
Every year I try to watch at least the nfl playoffs but every year the superbowl reminds me of why this sport will never get popular this face of the planet.
There are way too many commercial breaks and by the time the half time show is done, you actually forgot who was playing.
I saw kevin federline poking fun at himself but the best commercial was with Robert Goulet. This guy is a myth to me and he seems just as cool as he was in "The Greatest" (thanks again for the suggestion).

11:27 PM  
eugene said...

I think it was somewhat appropriate that during our Super Bowl watch there were several references to Aenas, the Trojan hero. There are two lines that stuck with me from the Aenid which I found often capable of summing up sports since I grew up.

First, and maybethe most famous line, "Perhaps it will be pleasing sometime to remember these things." There was definitely a time in our lives that athletes were, for lack of a better cliche, larger than life. I still remember how fast my heart beat when I saw Ozzie Smith in a grocery store. And I think you hit it right on where we look back on that time and we want to go back, to when athletes were that important. When they were invicble. And no amount of hyperbole could adequately describe their personality. It was a simplere time--where three As and two Bs got tickets to a game. And we watch now and we immerse ourselves in athletes who are now younger than us, hoping that somehow we will fall back through the looking glass and for however long we watch, we can reminisce and name drop athletes who have faded in the past, grasping to those straws of our youth.

Then second, Aeneas looks upon a picture of the sack of Troy and comments, "These are the tears of things, and our mortality cuts to the heart" I think that most Americans' obsession with the Super Bowl/World Series/NBA Finals correlates with their broken dreams. It was a bad movie but in Celtic Pride Daniel Stern's character gets upset because he says if he had the chance he would have worked harder. And I think there is this incorrect assumption that as fans, we for some reason, deserve victory. We pay money as taxpayers, we buy, memorabillia, we spend our days following a team, and when they lose or turn the ball over 6 times, they have failed us, and they didn't try hard enough. And if that was us, we would have worked harder. I think it ties back to what I said above too, we don't like to see these people who we made heroes out of fail because that means they are mortal, and if they are mortal, then they are like us.

I don't know, it was just something I thought of today, I liked the post, thought it was incredibly well written.

10:36 AM  
Large said...

I'm glad you dug the post, Eugene - thanks. You've definitely touched on something that is a big part of the No Mas outlook. We're interested in the guys who fail because of how it reduces them from myth to man, and because often they've failed because they've chosen to live in some way that is in opposition to the grand, soul-chewing machine of sports and the media. These failures give us a glimpse of reality that is infinitely preferable to the virtual reality of the Super Bowl universe.

11:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home