Monday, November 19, 2007

Darts, mate...



NO MAS TV REVIEW

Mayweather-Hatton 24/7
HBO, 30 minutes
Sunday nights, 10 p.m.




I admit that I was looking forward to the debut of Mayweather/Hattton 24-7 last night. I'm a sucker for big-time fight hype when it's done right, and the De La Hoya/Mayweather series, to my mind, was right as rain. It accomplished everything hype should and at the same time was compelling just as pure documentary. Not to mention that it was a straight-up knockout for the sport of boxing, always welcome in the land of Large.

Based on what I saw last night, Mayweather/Hatton is going to fall quite a bit short of that mark, which is perhaps not so much the fault of the show as the fault of the principals. Floyd is great television, but in small doses. In the De La Hoya series, he was electrifying, and yet it was for most of us a first journey into his strange universe of sociopathic would-be father figures and second childhood fueled by attention deficit disorder and conspicuous bricks of cheddar in every outstretched hand. Revisiting his tiny monarchy of mo' money, even sitting one on one with the King himself in an intimate fireside chat, one can't help but divine the bleeding obvious of Pretty Boy Floyd Mayweather - there's no there there.

Meanwhile, over in Manchester (to borrow the show's default transition), there turns out to be surprisingly less to Ricky Hatton than meets the eye. Watching his performance last night, I was reminded of Martin Amis's Keith Talent from the novel London Fields, an East End swindler of note much enamored of petty larceny, lager and the vicissitudes of the dart-board. The narrator in London Fields ends up taking darts lessons from Keith, and at one point throws the darts to the ground in disgust with his own ineptitude. Instantly, Keith leaps on him and pins him to the dartboard by his neck. "You don't never disrespect the darts mate," he says.

In other words, yes, yes, we get it Rick - you're a regular chap. Where's the darts, innit? Christ has there ever been such a self-conscious Prince of the Pub in all the history of the Empire? Keith Talent was a flipping parody for darts' sake - perpetrating this shtick as some version of reality is really, really not asking very much of your audience. On this score, I fault Hatton and his entourage first and foremost for being so beatifically enamored of his laddishness, but I also fault the producers of the show for letting him get away with it. The virtue of the De La Hoya/Mayweather affair was that it managed to probe beneath each fighter's well-manicured self-presentation. In Floyd's case, four episodes taught me all that I need to know. In that nothing much seems to have changed with him (money=good, dad=crazy), this current series is going to live and die with what Hatton brings to the table. And if that continues to be the documentarian's equivalent of a warm pint and a chippie, well, we're all in for a long fortnight lads, a long fortnight indeed.

7 Comments:

Chief said...

Tangent Alert:
Yeah so I'm out here in England and Darts are huge. The world series of darts is all over the TV.

Speaking of hype and British boxers, Calzaghe is talking madd shit trying to goad Hopkins into a unification fight. Guardian had a piece on it a few days back. http://sport.guardian.co.uk/boxing/story/0,,2211154,00.html

I'm not sure what the upside to X fighting Calzaghe is ($). But then again I didn't see the upside to him fighting Winky Wright either. Do you guys think this would be a good fight? I think it would have made more sense 5 years ago.

1:10 PM  
ml said...

my vote for self conscious prince of the pub = liam gallagher. though he's no sportsman is he? unless you count charity matches with Rod Stewart & cronies..

1:49 PM  
Large said...

Even five years ago it would have been boring Chief. But indeed, more relevant.

Calzaghe's problem is that there's just no big name left in his preferred weight class for a PPV-style superfight. Tarver, Roy, Winky - all as irrelevant as Ex. So Bernard is the one guy out there who he can probably do PPV numbers with. It makes sense at that level. Something tells me though that the fight won't happen. Bernard's a much bigger star in his mind than he is real life. The type of money he's going to demand will leave Calzag with nothing, and the fight will die. Then the Zag can't wait around and hope for a piece of the Kelly Pavlik pie. By this time next year, Pavlik should be big enough to carry a PPV with a fighter of Calzaghe's renown.

4:27 PM  
Chief said...

Apparently Hopkins is asking for a 60/40 split, which is pretty reasonable. I get the sense that Calzaghe would probably agree with you that there is no other big names in his weight class to fight, so he's desperate to to make the fight happen at any cost.

10:22 PM  
trickster said...

Guess right now there ist no better fight money- or mainstream-reputation-wise than Hopkins. If they fight early next year, Calzaghe hopefully can get the winner of pavlik-taylor II somewhere late next year.
Still I fear, once Joe has tasted 175 pounds, he won't torture himself down to 168 again. And neither Taylor nor Pavlik would got up that much for this fight.

That's why I still fear a RJJ battle on the horizont, mark my words. Not that I think it will be a good fight or it has any relevance. But if Tito and RJJ make decent PPV-numbers and Roy looks good - which I think he will, cuz against a blownup 105-years old Tito just about everyone would - this fight could still bring more money than a bout against a young but "unknown" fighter like Dawson. (and it would be a hell less dangerous for Calzaghe too).

11:35 PM  
Large said...

Excellent analysis Trickster, and I agree with you on just about every count. The only thing I'll say is that I do think that Roy will probably have the edge on Tito in that debacle of a fight, but I don't think that necessarily means he will look good. Even against someone as slow as Tito promises to be, I don't think Roy is willing risk enough to make a very good account of himself. So where Calzaghe goes after Ex is a mystery. If he loses, I guess he goes nowhere, and I wouldn't be surprised if Bernard beats him. It wouldn't be pretty, but man, Bernard is a pain in the ass in the ring.

10:13 AM  
Kopper said...

What do we think of the Vargas/Mayorga fight? Should I buy it?

5:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home