Friday, November 16, 2007

Here's yet another hit, Barry Bonds


Let me begin by saying that I kind of wish it was Lance. Of course, Lance isn't embroiled in any doping controversy at the moment, and maybe I'm wrong - maybe Lance, like Marion Jones, is too far removed from the public clamor at this point to make the kind of impact that I am looking for in the whole worldwide doping debacle. And what is that impact, you ask? Well, in short, if the steroids-in-sports situation is World War II, right now I'm waiting for Pearl Harbor, and I'm afraid that, huge as it is, the Barry Bonds indictment feels a little more like the Soviet Invasion or the conquest of the Balkans. In other words, big news here in the ole U.S. of A., but not quite big enough to mobilize the Joint Chiefs, not time yet for "we have nothing to fear..."

So much for the military analogy. In plain language, I don't think Bonds resonates enough with people right now to make this the kind of soul-searching, era-defining moment that the steroids epidemic begs for. On that score, it's a shame he's such a dick, because if he provoked any sympathy at all in the public, his whole evil saga would have shocked the shit out of people. As it is, it's merely the whimper of an ending that we've known was coming all along. The helmet's off Darth, big whoop. He's dirtier than dirt, and we all made our peace with that a long time ago, home-run-king or not. That MLB ad that was running seven or eight times an hour all throughout the playoffs, the one with the jingle that still resonates faintly in my ears sometimes and tells me in no uncertain voice to go out into the street and start killing little children and small fluffy animals... that ad carried a not terribly subtle message about Bonds and the home-run record and the state of the national pastime. It began with a child putting a Hank Aaron baseball card up on a ledge and staring at it with all the wonder that his CGI-enhanced eyes could summon. And we all know what the wonder of a child means in the visual vernacular of television. THIS is the real and true legacy of baseball. This is the innocent integrity of our game. For MLB to choose that ad and that image to run incessantly during the postseason while behind the scenes rumors of the Bonds indictment were legion... it was no accident, no indeed.

So who, I wonder, WHO is it that's going to test positive for steroids and by the mere shock of the revelation prompt a paradigm shift? Michael Phelps, right before he wins his eighth gold medal in Beijing? Peyton Manning, right after the Super Bowl? Katie Couric? Oprah? It's hard for me to imagine at this point. Marion Jones came about seven years too late, and the overwhelmingly underwhelming response proves only how short the American attention span is when it comes to track and field and the Olympics. And as I said, the time when a big Lance revelation might have rocked the nation is probably long past as well. In the end, I just don't know who it could be, other than the fact that it ain't Bonds. But I guess that's the way it should be. The knockout punch is almost always the one you don't see coming. Plus, if we'd known the Japanese were going to bomb Pearl Harbor, we would have done something about it, right? Right?

9 Comments:

C.I. said...

Large, what's your sense of what is going on on the HGH front now? How widespread do you feel use is. What percent baseball players do you think are using some kind of performance enhancer that would surpise us?

And in terms of restoring the game to the prelapsarian era, should we care or is it Canseco time to just know people use performance enhancers and just enjoy it.

11:59 AM  
Kopper said...

I don't think "Pearl Harbor" is going to be any 1 player. I think the Mitchell report will be the levees breaking, and people will start to talk. There are lots of Greg Anderson's out there. For Cards fans, maybe Ankiel might have been their low point. But unless a Jeter, or a Johan Santana, or even a Manny Ramirez are on the list, I don' tthink there could be enough single star-power to change people's perceptions. And A-Rod is 1 step below Barry in terms of fan enmity, so I don't count him.

12:38 PM  
Large said...

Jeter is a good one. Jeter blows the roof off the motherfucker. I hadn't thought of him. It has to be someone who garners such universal love and good feelings that he does. Manny Ramierez I think is not quite in the same category and Santana just doesn't have the brand recognition.

I-berg, I have no idea in baseball, but in the track and field and particularly weightlifting sphere, I think the cat and mouse game of ever evolving drugs and ever evolving tests to catch those drugs continues unabated. Weightlifting does seem to have come to an interesting place - I think it is rare now that a doping lifter does not get caught. The number and sophistication of the tests has just become too overwhelming, and I think there is a general optimism that they've cracked the code for the specific types of drugs that weightlifters want and need to use. Of course, there has been such optimism before.

1:48 PM  
Kevin said...

check pics of nomar.
serious, so maybe that nails mia too.

hgh is the thing.
its probably easier to name who hasnt taken it.

and large, what are you french?

leave lance alone.

10:13 PM  
Large said...

Lance is dirty, Kev. We'll all know that eventually.

9:30 AM  
Kevin said...

you'd be crazy not to think lance is dirty.

but dont go tugging on supermans cape.

he cured cancer. lol.

9:47 AM  
CzarKyle said...

Why did you wish it was Lance? I'd prefer to see Barry go down. I just wish the air would clear and we'd all be able to see who the "users" are.

10:09 AM  
Large said...

Well my point, Czar K, is that I think Lance would make a greater impression on people right now than Bonds does. And I am convinced that Lance was doping.

10:33 AM  
howard in nyc said...

i am a sf giants fan, and have been on the issue since before barry was juicing. my dumb opinion is plastered in various other internet locales, i will spare you guys here. but i think hgh is about as widespread in baseball as anabolic steroids are and have been for decades in pro and college football. a big part of the landscape, and as long as there remains no effective test for detecting hgh, not likely to change. it has been canseco time for quite a number of years, certainly for the powers that be in major league baseball.

if i cared, i would've stopped watching baseball and rooting for the giants years ago. but i came to accept ped in football and track decades ago; accepting it as a fact in baseball was not a great leap for me.

somehow, when i read ball four at the tender age of 13, learning that ballplayers took amphetamines to enhance their hangover performance somehow did not warp my fragile little mind.

8:11 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home