Pascal’s Wager and Other Thoughts
posted by Large
Pascal’s wager is a suggestion posed by the French philosopher Blaise Pascal that even though the existence of God cannot be determined through reason, a person should wager as though God exists, because so living has everything to gain, and nothing to lose.
Jean Pascal took quite a gamble last night. Never known as the hardest of punching 68′s, he jumped to light heavy to take a shot at a title belt against the rugged Romanian, Adrian Diaconu. It was a brilliant promotion, two Montreal-based fighters duking it out at the Bell Centre, and the fight was a corker from start to finish, as Pascal took his familiar approach of boxing, then brawling, then boxing/brawling, and all the while relying on what is emerging as one of the most cast-iron jaws in the entire sport.
There was a time when I was not all that enamored of Jean Pascal. He talks a big game, and about two years ago he started generating a buzz as the next big thing at 68. The fates seemed to be pointing towards a high-profile showdown between him and Edison Miranda, and Miranda showed up ringside in Florida to watch Pascal face off with Omar Pittman on FNF. In that fight, Pascal danced and showboated and then nearly got whupped, as Pittman went hardhead on him and turned the tables mid-fight in what almost turned into one of those ever-so-satisfying hunted-becomes-the-hunter moments.
But Pascal survived, got the UD, and then got into a farcical screaming match with Miranda that didn’t impress me much. On the whole, I came away that night thinking that Pascal was another good-looking bag of hot gas at 68, Jeff Lacy on the bike.
















