No Mas Book Review – "Tunney"
Merry merry, fight fans. If you’re a follower of the fistic arts and happen to find yourself holding a little extra holiday coin these days or one of those inevitable Barnes and Noble gift cards, you could do worse for yourself than to blow it on Jack Cavanaugh’s new biography of Gene Tunney, titled ‘Tunney: Boxing’s Brainiest Champ and His Upset of the Great Jack Dempsey.†It’s a strange book, ultimately unsatisfying, but still a relatively quick and engaging read.
As for its strangeness, the first thing you should know about the book is that to characterize it as a Gene Tunney biography is misleading. The subtitle is closer to the mark, because the book is as much about Dempsey as it is about Tunney. But for a good two thirds of the way through, it’s not really about either of them, or it is, but only in so far as you find them in the midst of a mishmash of boxing stories told in a rambling anecdotal style that often has little rhyme or reason. A description of Dempsey’s early days as a fighter in Colorado leads to a description of the corruption in boxing in the early part of the century which leads to a chronological history of Italian heavyweight Primo Carnera, a titlist in the 30′s known for winning fixed bouts. These types of illogical leaps and sidebars occur everywhere until Cavanaugh reaches the two Dempsey/Tunney fights, at which point he focuses and the story goes from meandering to gripping.
But Cavanaugh is an able boxing yarn-spinner, so even when he strays far off message (almost an entire chapter, for instance, devoted to the trials and tribulations of Battling Levinsky, who Tunney beat for the American light heavyweight title), he is entertaining and does a sound job of bringing the era to life. Which is gratifying for the true fight fan, because this is the golden era of the sweet science. The characters he’s dealing with , Levinsky, Harry Greb, Tex Rickard, Leo Flynn, Doc Kearns, Damon Runyan, Grantland Rice , are some of the biggest and most colorful the sport has ever produced.
Unfortunately, in the midst of this Dickensian cast, the main character gets short shrift, which is disappointing. I’ve always been fascinated by the Tunney myth , fighter as thinker, thinker as fighter , and I was eager for an intimate portrait of the man who twice tamed the true Man Killer of the Gilded Age and in between the two bouts took time off to give a Shakespeare lecture at Yale.
Clearly Cavanaugh is as taken with that myth as I am, and yet he doesn’t penetrate it in the slightest, such that if you know the thumbnail sketch of Tunney’s life going in , fighting Marine, smart, read a lot, a great fighter who beat Dempsey twice, married an heiress and retired young , you aren’t bound to leave the book knowing much more than you did in the first place. I suppose that’s a pretty damning accusation of a biography, but there you are. I enjoyed the book in spite of this glaring fault. In fact, I read it greedily. If you’re as fascinated with this era of boxing as I am, I think you’ll do the same.
























